Nadeshiko Y.

asked • 11/08/13

Time required for center temperature of cube?

Determine the time required for center temperature of cube to reach 80C. the cube has volume of 125 cm3. Thermal conductivity of material is 0.4 W/(m C); density is 950 kg/m3, and specific heat is 3.4 kJ/(kg K). the initial temperature is 20C. The surrounding temperature is 90C. The cube is immersed in a fluid that results in negligible surface resistance to heat transfer.

3 Answers By Expert Tutors

By:

Brad M.

tutor
Time constant = m Cp L / (k A) is about 1700 seconds => two time c's cooks 60C/70C ~ 1hr
Report

11/10/13

Timothy S. answered • 11/09/13

Tutor
5 (9)

Will help you LOVE math, science, and computing!

Nadeshiko Y.

I'm a little bit confused, starting from part:
T(x,y,z,t) = 90C + ΣiΣjΣkai,j,kexp(-a2ci,j,kt)sin(iπx/.05)sin(jπy/.05)sin(kπz/.05)

 with ci,j,k=(π/.05)2(i2+j2+k2)
 
and ai,j,k=-(90-20)(2/π)3(1/ijk)(1-(-1)i)(1-(-1)j)(1-(-1)k)
 
what does this i,j,k represent?
what do you mean by "iπx", "jπy", "kπz"?
 
thank you
Report

11/09/13

Timothy S.

The function T(x,y,z,t) is the function for the temperature of the cube at position x,y,z at time t that we are trying to find.
 
We know the function exists, and is governed by the heat equation and the boundary conditions described above. The summation is a solution to that boundary value problem using fourier series. 
 
i, j, and k represent indices along which we perform the summation (one for each dimension x,y,z) they run from 0 to +∞.
 
iπx, etc, are literally the products of the index at that term, pi, and the location x,y, or z within the cube for which you are trying to solve the heat equation.
 
With that solution to the heat equation, you are looking to find a t such that T(x,y,z,t) = 80C, chottou muzukashii no ni, wakarimasu ka? 
 
It is a nasty mathematical expression, to be sure, but it is not particularly difficult to solve by newton-rhapson methods / bfgs. (its no different than any other convex optimization problem) 
 
Since that involves some calculus and theory that is difficult to present here, but knowing that t is monotonically approaching your value, I would suggest the following to come to a quick result:
 
1.) Set up the summation in your calculator to run for ~40 terms for each of i,j,k
2.) Pick an initial guess t0.
3.) Set tmax = t0
3.) double tmax until T(.025,.025,.025, tmax) > 80
4.) Set tmin = t0
5.) Halve tmin until T(.025,.025,.025, tmin) < 80
4.) We now start iterating on t until we find the value, for each tk,
    4a.) if T(.025,.025,.025, tk) > 80, then set tk+1 = (tk + tmin) / 2 and set tmax = tk.
    4b.) if T(.025,.025,.025, tk) < 80, then set tk+1 = (t+tmax)/2 and set tmin = tk.
5.) Repeat step 4 as many times as necessary until T(.025,.025,.025, tk) is as close as you would like to 80C.
If you notice t is taking off to infinity then you know there is no solution. However, that will not happen here as your surrounding fluid is a higher temperature than your desired internal temperature and we assumed infinite energy in the fluid. This should bring you to an answer with relative speed. 
 
If this still doesn't make sense, I will write you an example program that solves it so you can see it in action.
 
 
Report

11/10/13

Andre W.

tutor
Timothy's solution can be simplified when we take the x-y-z symmetry of the problem into account. The 3-d Fourier series you get when you solve for the unaccomplished temperature ratio, (90-T)/(90-20), can be written as the cube of a single Fourier series,  Σn=1anexp(-a² cn t)sin(nπx/.05), with an and cn defined in accordance with Timothy's definitions of aijk and cijk. Substitute in T=80, x=0.025 and take the cube root to get (1/7)1/3= Σ anexp(-a² cn t) sin(nπ/2). The series converges rapidly, and it may be good enough to approximate it with the first term, so solve (1/7)1/3=  a1exp(-a² c1 t) for t. If that's not good enough, you can at least use it as your first guess in the numerical solution.
Also, the values of unaccomplished temperature ratios as functions of time and a2 are well tabulated for infinite slabs, and our cube is just the intersection of three perpendicular infinite slabs of thickness 0.05.
Report

11/10/13

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.