Andrew R. answered 03/12/21
2000+ Elo, Specializing in turning Beginners into Experts
Hi! The choice between 1.e4 and 1.d4 has been debated between chess players for a very, very long time.
There's lots of "common wisdom" like the statements you just made. 1.e4 is better for tactical players. 1.d4 is better for positional players. Some say you should pick one and stick to it. Afterall, didn't the great Bobby Fischer play 1.e4 all the time?
The problem is, none of that is true.
In his 1972 championship match with Spassky, Fischer played 1.c4! (which transposed into a queen's gambit declined.) He also played Alekhine's defense as black. People were shocked! Wasn't Fischer a tactical, 1.e4 player?
Fischer's secret was that he understood chess. While he played mostly 1.e4, he knew how to play many, many other openings. The truth is, a player should master 1.e4 and 1.d4, regardless of which one he chooses to play most frequently OTB. An e4 player should know how to play a queens gambit as white and black. A d4 player should know how to play an Italian or a Ruy Lopez. A player like this, like Fischer, will understand chess, and be able to play any position.