James F. answered 06/20/14
Tutor
5
(6)
Data Scientist and former Statistics Professor
Based on the wording in the question, I'm not sure that Baye's formula needs to be used. Typically, if we have P(A|B) and need to get P(B|A), we will use Bayes. But in the problem above, none of the statements seem to have that flavor. Based on the current wording I would solve it like this:
S = Settled without Fuss
S- = Not Settled without Fuss
A = Insured by company A
B = Insured by company B
P(A) = .4
P(B) = .6
P(A and S) = .01
P(A and S-) = .002
P(B and S) = .008
P(B and S-) = .001
We want P(S-|A) = P(S- and A)/P(A) = .002/.4 = .005
Next, P(S-|B) = P(S- and B)/P(B) = .001/.6 = .0025
S = Settled without Fuss
S- = Not Settled without Fuss
A = Insured by company A
B = Insured by company B
P(A) = .4
P(B) = .6
P(A and S) = .01
P(A and S-) = .002
P(B and S) = .008
P(B and S-) = .001
We want P(S-|A) = P(S- and A)/P(A) = .002/.4 = .005
Next, P(S-|B) = P(S- and B)/P(B) = .001/.6 = .0025
IF you changed the wording so that it said "Of the fire claims settled without fuss, 1% are from company A," it would change the problem for sure.