Teaching the LSAT allows me to combine two passions: legal reasoning and mentorship. As a current law student at New York Law School with experience as a Teaching Assistant for Property Law and participation in both the Kings County Prosecution Clinic and the Street Law Clinic, I’ve developed a deep appreciation for how critical analytical thinking is—not only in the classroom but in legal practice itself.
My path through law has sharpened the same skills the LSAT tests: logical reasoning,...
Teaching the LSAT allows me to combine two passions: legal reasoning and mentorship. As a current law student at New York Law School with experience as a Teaching Assistant for Property Law and participation in both the Kings County Prosecution Clinic and the Street Law Clinic, I’ve developed a deep appreciation for how critical analytical thinking is—not only in the classroom but in legal practice itself.
My path through law has sharpened the same skills the LSAT tests: logical reasoning, reading comprehension, and structured argumentation. From drafting motions at the New Jersey Office of the Public Defender to conducting case research and courtroom observations, I’ve learned how precision in language and logic can determine outcomes. These experiences give me a practical framework for teaching students how to think like lawyers long before they enter law school.
As someone who once faced the challenge of mastering the LSAT myself, I understand both the frustration and the breakthrough moments that come with preparation. I approach teaching with empathy and adaptability—tailoring strategies to each student’s learning style, reinforcing fundamentals, and breaking down complex logic games or passages into intuitive, teachable parts.
Ultimately, my goal as an LSAT instructor is not just to raise scores, but to cultivate confidence and critical reasoning—the same skills that lead to success in law school and beyond. I want students to leave my sessions not just ready for the test, but ready for the mindset of a future lawyer.
